Skip to Main Content
USC logo

Scientific reports

A guide to writing scientific reports

Learning objectives

This resource will help you:

  • Understand the purpose and structure of the discussion and conclusion sections.
  • Distinguish between stating results and analysing and interpreting the findings of the research in the context of existing literature.

Overview of the discussion section

In the discussion section you critically analyse your results in the context of what is already known in the literature. Here you show the significance of your results by answering the questions: What does it mean? and So what? This section generally starts with a short summary of your key findings followed by the meaning and importance of those findings and any limitations that your study had. Your discussion should be engaging and help the reader understand why they should care about your findings. (Nair & Nair, 2014; Kumar, 2023; Wu, 2011).

Checklist for discussion section

When writing your discussion, consider the following tips (Ecorrector, 2023; Kumar, 2023; Nair & Nair, 2014; Teodosiu, 2019).

Do:  
  • Begin with a brief summary of the study's key findings. 
  • Ensure you relate your results back to your objectives/hypothesis.  
  • Outline the significance and importance of your findings and why the reader should care.  
  • State whether the results support or disprove your hypothesis. If your hypothesis is disproved, what might be the reasons? 
  • Describe unexpected findings and discuss potential causes for the results you have observed. 
  • After seeing the results of the experiment, is there a need to expand your thinking of the research question? Indicate the steps necessary to pursue unresolved questions.  
  • Discuss limitations to your study that would affect its applicability to a broader context. 
Do not:  
  • Repeat information from your background/introduction. 
  • Simply rehash your results that you have stated in the results section. 
  • Discuss other people’s results.
  • Include new arguments or evidence that were not previously discussed.  
  • Even if your research contains limitations, do not undermine your authority by including statements that cast doubts on your methods and their execution.  
  • Overstate the importance of the findings or generalise. Making grand statements about the importance of your findings without evidence will lead to doubts in the research.  
  • Use general wording like "the study aims were fulfilled" or “results agree with XYZ” without explaining or discussing how they were fulfilled or how they agree.

Example structure of a discussion section

Table 1. General structure of a discussion section. Adapted from sciwrite standford. (2013, September 11). Sainani SciWrite 5.5 [Video]. YouTube.
Part of the discussion section Some pointers
Key finding (answer to the question/s asked in introduction)
  • Start with something like: "We found that..."
  • Explain what the data mean in context of the research question/context of research (big-picture!).
  • Explain what the data mean in context of the literature.
  • State if the findings are novel.
Key secondary findings
  • Present your other key findings as per above - contextualise in both the research question and the literature.
  • Only group key findings together (and discuss together) if it is logical to do so. A good way to structure is to present a key finding, discuss it in the context of the research question and literature, then move to the next key finding.
Context
  • Compare your results with other people's results (generally peer-reviewed publications).
  • Discuss how your findings support or challenge the paradigm.
Strength and limitations
  • Anticipate the readers' questions/criticism.
  • Identify any limitations your study may have, and explain why your results are (or are not) robust or relevant despite limitations.
What's next
  • Suggest confirmation of your results is needed with further studies.
  • Point out unanswered questions and future directions.
The "so what?": implicate, speculate, recommend
  • Give the big-picture implications of your findings
  • Tell the reader why they should care

Conclusion

While the conclusion is the last section of your report, it is just as important as any of the other sections of your scientific report. Generally, this section is the last paragraph of the discussion or presented under a separate subheading.

Your course specific guidelines will tell you which version is preferred for your assessment task.


When writing your conclusion, consider the following tips (Nair & Nair, 2014; Tablas-Mejia, 2021):

Do:
  • Keep it short. Conclusions are typically one paragraph long.  
  • Provide a brief overview of your research and whether or not it answers your research question/s.  
  • Mention the limitations and key implications of your study. Be transparent about your study’s shortcomings. This is not only ethical but also helps guide future work (i.e. replication of the study or follow-on work).
  • Provide a brief outline of future research based on the results of your study. 
Do not:
  • Introduce new information. However, you may offer suggestions on how your research can be expanded or improved.
  • Include references or mention results from other studies.
  • Exceed the length of the discussion.

Additional resources

This video (23:50 min) from the Saginaw Valley State University (SVSU Science Writing; 2021) provides an overview of the IMRaD discussion (9:04 min to 13:44 min), components of the discussion and common mistakes.

This video (3:36 min) from the Saginaw Valley State University (SVSU Science Writing; 2021) provides an overview of the IMRaD conclusion. 

Access Student Services

Your input matters: Shape the future of academic skills support!

References

Ecorrector. (2023, July 17). Dos and Don’ts When Writing Discussion Sections. ECORRECTOR. https://ecorrector.com/dos-and-donts-when-writing-discussion-sections/

Irving, P. M., Iqbal, T., Nwokolo, C., Subramanian, S., Bloom, S., Prasad, N., Hart, A., Murray, C., Lindsay, J. O., Taylor, A., Barron, R.& Wright, S. (2018). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, pilot study of cannabidiol-rich botanical extract in the symptomatic treatment of ulcerative colitis. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, 24, 714-724. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izy002

Kumar, P. (2023). Improving IMRaD for writing research articles in social, and health sciences. International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 2(1), 50-53. https://doi.org/10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V2I1P107  

Nair, P. K. R., & Nair, V. D. (2014). Scientific writing and communication in agriculture and natural resources. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03101-9 

sciwrite standford. (2013, September 11). Sainani SciWrite 5.5 [Video]. YouTube.

SVSU Science Writing. (2021, June 18). The IMRaD format: the conclusion section [Video]. YouTube.

SVSU Science Writing. (2021, June 29). The IMRaD format: results & discussion [Video]. YouTube.

Tablas-Mejia, I. (2021). Conclusion section for research papers. San José State University Writing Center. https://www.sjsu.edu/writingcenter/docs/handouts/Conclusion%20Section%20for%20Research%20Papers.pdf 

Teodosiu, M. (2019). Scientific writing and publishing with IMRaD. Annals of Forest Research, 62(2), 201-214. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2019.1759 

Wu, J. (2011). Improving the writing of research papers: IMRAD and beyond. Landscape Ecology, 26(10), 1345-1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9674-3

© University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia | ABN 28 441 859 157 | CRICOS Provider No. 01595D