This resource will help you:
In the discussion section you critically analyse your results in the context of what is already known in the literature. Here you show the significance of your results by answering the questions: What does it mean? and So what? This section generally starts with a short summary of your key findings followed by the meaning and importance of those findings and any limitations that your study had. Your discussion should be engaging and help the reader understand why they should care about your findings. (Nair & Nair, 2014; Kumar, 2023; Wu, 2011).
When writing your discussion, consider the following tips (Ecorrector, 2023; Kumar, 2023; Nair & Nair, 2014; Teodosiu, 2019).
| Part of the discussion section | Some pointers |
|---|---|
| Key finding (answer to the question/s asked in introduction) |
|
| Key secondary findings |
|
| Context |
|
| Strength and limitations |
|
| What's next |
|
| The "so what?": implicate, speculate, recommend |
|
While the conclusion is the last section of your report, it is just as important as any of the other sections of your scientific report. Generally, this section is the last paragraph of the discussion or presented under a separate subheading.
When writing your conclusion, consider the following tips (Nair & Nair, 2014; Tablas-Mejia, 2021):
This video (23:50 min) from the Saginaw Valley State University (SVSU Science Writing; 2021) provides an overview of the IMRaD discussion (9:04 min to 13:44 min), components of the discussion and common mistakes.
This video (3:36 min) from the Saginaw Valley State University (SVSU Science Writing; 2021) provides an overview of the IMRaD conclusion.
Ecorrector. (2023, July 17). Dos and Don’ts When Writing Discussion Sections. ECORRECTOR. https://ecorrector.com/dos-and-donts-when-writing-discussion-sections/
Irving, P. M., Iqbal, T., Nwokolo, C., Subramanian, S., Bloom, S., Prasad, N., Hart, A., Murray, C., Lindsay, J. O., Taylor, A., Barron, R.& Wright, S. (2018). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, pilot study of cannabidiol-rich botanical extract in the symptomatic treatment of ulcerative colitis. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, 24, 714-724. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izy002
Kumar, P. (2023). Improving IMRaD for writing research articles in social, and health sciences. International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 2(1), 50-53. https://doi.org/10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V2I1P107
Nair, P. K. R., & Nair, V. D. (2014). Scientific writing and communication in agriculture and natural resources. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03101-9
sciwrite standford. (2013, September 11). Sainani SciWrite 5.5 [Video]. YouTube.
SVSU Science Writing. (2021, June 18). The IMRaD format: the conclusion section [Video]. YouTube.
SVSU Science Writing. (2021, June 29). The IMRaD format: results & discussion [Video]. YouTube.
Tablas-Mejia, I. (2021). Conclusion section for research papers. San José State University Writing Center. https://www.sjsu.edu/writingcenter/docs/handouts/Conclusion%20Section%20for%20Research%20Papers.pdf
Teodosiu, M. (2019). Scientific writing and publishing with IMRaD. Annals of Forest Research, 62(2), 201-214. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2019.1759
Wu, J. (2011). Improving the writing of research papers: IMRAD and beyond. Landscape Ecology, 26(10), 1345-1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9674-3