Research outputs in this category include visual art work in an appropriate medium expressing ideas that lead to new knowledge and/or advance the development and understanding of the creative arts. Works may contribute to the broader cultural debate or develop or extend art historical/theoretical debates surrounding specific genres of creative production (e.g. painting, video, ceramics). Research outputs in this category are only eligible if the researcher is the creator of the creative work. The work must have been made publicly available usually through exhibition by a recognised museum or exhibiting authority of standing.
The work should exhibit originality in at least one of the following ways:
The types of works that may meet this definition include:
The types of works that do not meet this definitions include:
Evidence of excellence would include:
This category would recognise the following as exhibition venues:
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
A standard output constitutes a new and significant addition to the creator’s oeuvre. The endevaour is typically sustained over less than one year. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the work, which should exhibit at least one of the following attributes:
A newly created major body of work/film/performance of significant scale and artistic complexity. The endeavor is typically sustained over one to five years. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the publicly available work, which should exhibit at least two of the following attributes:
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| J1 | Visual art work ERA eligible, done at UniSC |
| J1Ext | Visual art work ERA eligible, not done at UniSC |
| J1n | Visual art work not ERA eligible |
Research outputs in this category include architecture and design (built or unbuilt) undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge in the context of architecture, design, and creative arts research. This may include new techniques of conceptualisation, design, fabrication, or compositional processes, or new relationships to programs of social utility. The output documentation should be some form of design documentation, and there should be supporting documentation to show that the design has entered the public domain in some way. Research outputs in this category are only eligible if the researcher is the creator of the creative work.
Architecture and design that exhibits originality in at least one of the following ways:
The types of works that may meet this criteria include:
Evidence of excellence would include:
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
A standard output constitutes a new and significant addition to a designer’s oeuvre which is made publicly available. The endevaour is typically sustained over less than one year. The designer should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the work, which should exhibit at least one of the following attributes:
A major output involves new work of significant scale and artistic complexity. The endevaour is typically sustained over one to five years. The designer should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the publicly available work, which should exhibit at least two of the following attributes:
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| J2 | Design/architectural work ERA eligible, done at UniSC |
| J2Ext | Design/architectural work ERA eligible, not done at UniSC |
| J2n | Design/architectural work not ERA eligible |
Research outputs in this category include textual work in different fields of creative and/or critical endeavour that embodies research and is not eligible to be submitted as a traditional output (such as a book or journal article). This involves the creation of new and original works or the generation of novel insights about existing texts. The category recognises the creation of the body of work or new work that has been published in a copyright-able medium by a recognised publisher or broadcaster, or represented in the context of a major arts organisation or event. Works are undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge and/or advance the development and understanding of literary and/or other written forms.
The types of works that may meet this criteria include:
The types of works that do not meet this criteria include:
Evidence of excellence would include:
Additional evidence of significance and impact may be provided by anthologisation and/or re-publication.
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
A standard output constitutes a new and significant addition to an author’s oeuvre, such as a short story, individual poems or substantial revisions to previously published creative works. The author should have a credited or acknowledged sole author or a significant role in the creation of the published work, which should exhibit at least one of the following attributes:
A major work involves new writing of significant scale and complexity, such as a novel, play, or major collection of short stories or poems. The author should have a credited or acknowledged sole author or a significant role in the creation of the published work, which should exhibit at least two of the following attributes:
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| J3 | Textual work ERA eligible, done at UniSC |
| J3Ext | Textual work ERA eligible, not done at UniSC |
| J3n | Textual work not ERA eligible |
Research outputs that cannot be classified under another Original Creative Work sub-category or other NTRO category. Works in this category must be original research undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge. This may offer a new contribution to broad cultural debates, or develop of rextend historical, theorteical or design debates.
Evidence of excellence would include:
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
A standard output constitutes a new and significant addition to the work of the author. The endevaour is typically sustained over less than one year. The author should have a credited or acknowledged sole author or a significant role in the creation of the published work, which should exhibit at least one of the following attributes:
A major work involves new writing of significant scale and complexity, such as a major scholarly edition. The endevaour is typically sustained over one to five years. The author should have a credited or acknowledged sole author or a significant role in the creation of the published work, which should exhibit at least two of the following attributes:
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| J4 | Other original creative work ERA eligible, done at UniSC |
| J4Ext | Other original creative work ERA eligible, not done at UniSC |
| J4n | Other original creative work not ERA eligible |
Research outptus in this category include musical performance embodying research and undertaken on a systematic basis extends knowledge and/ or develops the work of other creative artists and researchers in music and other fields. The live performance should exhibit originality, extending the boundaries of existing ideas, methodologies, approaches, creative or improvisational techniques. This may include repertoire performed according to new ideas of performance practice. The significance of any new work rests on its entry into public discourse through live performance, and subsequent forms of public dissemination.
The types of works that may meet this criteria include:
Evidence of excellence would include:
Additional evidence of significance and impact may be provided by repeat performances and reviews.
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
A standard output constitutes a new and significant addition to the work of the creator. The endevaour is typically sustained over less than one year. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the publicly performed work, which should exhibit at least one of the following attributes:
A major output involves new work of significant scale and complexity. The endevaour is typically sustained over one to five years. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the publicly performed work, which should exhibit at least two of the following attributes:
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| J5 | Music ERA eligible, done at UniSC |
| J5Ext | Music ERA eligible, not done at UniSC |
| J5n | Music not ERA eligible |
Research outputs in this category include theatre or other dramatic performance embodying research and undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge and/or advance understanding in the context of the arts and humanities. A live theatrical performance of new and original work that extends knowledge and/or develops the work of other artists and researchers. The live performance should exhibit originality, extending the boundaries of the art form, by introducing new ideas, methodologies, creative approaches, and/or techniques. This may include repertoire performed according to experimental processes.
The types of works that may meet this criteria include:
Evidence of excellence would include:
Additional evidence of significance and impact may be provided by repeat performances and reviews.
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
A standard output constitutes a new and significant addition to the work of the creator. The endevaour is typically sustained over less than one year. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the performance, which should exhibit at least one of the following attributes:
A major output involves new work of significant scale and complexity. The endevaour is typically sustained over one to five years. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the performance, which should exhibit at least two of the following attributes:
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| J6 | Play ERA eligible, done at UniSC |
| J6Ext | Play ERA eligible, not done at UniSC |
| J6n | Play not ERA eligible |
Research outputs in this category include dance performance embodying research and undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge and/or advance understanding in the context of the arts, and humanities and extends and/or develops new knowledge in the performing arts and other fields.
The types of works that may meet this criteria include:
Evidence of excellence would include:
Additional evidence of significance and impact may be provided by repeat performances and reviews.
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
A standard output constitutes a new and significant addition to the work of the creator. The endevaour is typically sustained over less than one year. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the dance work, which should exhibit at least one of the following attributes:
A major output involves new work of significant scale and complexity. The endevaour is typically sustained over one to five years. The work of the creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the dance work, which should exhibit at least two of the following attributes:
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| J7 | Dance ERA eligible, done at UniSC |
| J7Ext | Dance ERA eligible, not done at UniSC |
| J7n | Dance not ERA eligible |
Research outputs in this category include live performances that are not otherwise able to be classed as Live Performance (Dance), Live Performance (Music) or Live Performance (Play), and are not able to be classified in any of the other NTRO categories. Works embodying research and undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge and/or advance understanding in the context of the arts and humanities. The live performance should exhibit originality, extending the boundaries of the art form, by introducing new ideas, methodologies, creative approaches, and/or techniques. This may include repertoire performed according to experimental processes.
The types of works that may meet this criteria include:
Evidence of excellence would include:
Additional evidence of significance and impact may be provided by repeat performances and reviews.
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
A standard output constitutes a new and significant addition to the work of the creator. The endevaour is typically sustained over less than one year. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the performance, which should exhibit at least one of the following attributes:
A major output involves new work of significant scale and complexity. The endevaour is typically sustained over one to five years. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the performance, which should exhibit at least two of the following attributes:
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| J8 | Other performance ERA eligible, done at UniSC |
| J8Ext | Other performance ERA eligible, not done at UniSC |
| J8n | Other performance not ERA eligible |
Research outputs in this category include new and original research outputs embodying research that has been created specifically for presentation in an audio-visual format and is undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge and/or advance understanding in the context of the creative arts or other scholarly disciplines. This may include traditional scholarship presented in a documentary format or production of new material specifically for an audio-visual medium. For works in this category, the creative research component is contained within the recording/rendering. The significance of any new work rests on its entry into public discourse through presentation in an audio-visual format.
The work should exhibit originality in at least one of the following ways:
The types of works that may meet this criteria include:
The types of works that may not meet this criteria include:
Evidence of excellence would include:
Additional evidence of significance and impact may be provided by invitations to republish, and by reviews.
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
A standard output constitutes a new and significant addition to the work of the creator. The endevaour is typically sustained over less than one year. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the work, which should exhibit at least one of the following attributes:
A major output involves new work of significant scale and complexity. The endevaour is typically sustained over one to five years. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the work, which should exhibit at least two of the following attributes:
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| J9 | Film, video ERA eligible, done at UniSC |
| J9Ext | Film, video ERA eligible, not done at UniSC |
| J9n | Film, video not ERA eligible |
Research outputs in this category include new and original recording or rendering of performance that extends knowledge and/or develops the work of other creative artists and researchers in music, dance, theatre, and other fields. For works in this category, the creative research component is contained within the recording/rendering. The significance of any new work rests on its entry into public discourse through publication.
The types of works that may meet this criteria include:
The types of works that may not meet this criteria include:
Evidence of excellence would include:
Additional evidence of significance and impact may be provided by anthologisation and/or the invitation to republish, and by reviews.
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
A standard output constitutes a new and significant addition to the work of the creator. The endevaour is typically sustained over less than one year. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the published work, which should exhibit at least one of the following attributes:
A major work involves an extensive or comprehensive new recording of significant complexity. The endevaour is typically sustained over one to five years. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the publically available work, which should exhibit at least two of the following attributes:
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| J10 | Recorded performance ERA eligible, done at UniSC |
| J10Ext | Recorded performance ERA eligible, not done at UniSC |
| J10n | Recorded performance not ERA eligible |
Research outputs in this category include original or newly recorded or rendered creative work resulting from systematic research based on experimental, interactive, hybrid, or interdisciplinary arts processes, which increases the stock of knowledge and/or advances understanding in fields across the research spectrum, primarily in the creative arts. Works in this category are produced in association with other researchers in other disciplinary fields and for which the creative research component is contained within the recording/rendering. The significance of any new work rests on its entry into public discourse through exhibition or publication.
The types of works that may meet this criteria include:
Evidence of excellence would include:
Additional evidence of significance and impact may be provided by anthologisation and/or invitations to republish and by reviews.
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
A standard output constitutes a new and significant addition to the work of the creator. The endeavor is typically sustained over less than one year. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the work, which should exhibit at least one of the following attributes:
A major output involves new work of significant scale and complexity. The endeavor is typically sustained over one to five years. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the work, which should exhibit at least two of the following attributes:
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| J11 | Inter-arts ERA eligible, done at UniSC |
| J11Ext | Inter-arts ERA eligible, not done at UniSC |
| J11n | Inter-arts not ERA eligible |
Research outputs in this category include original work created specifically for a digital medium embodying research and undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge and/or advance understanding in fields across the research spectrum, primarily in design and the creative arts. This may include new dynamic visualisation techniques and other forms of modelling, the extension of modelling approaches to additional dimensions, or the use of new applications of existing material, forms, software or ideas. For works in this category, the creative research component is contained within the recording/rendering. The output should be in a form that is publicly available and enables dissemination of knowledge. The significance of any new work rests on its entry into public discourse through publication.
The work should exhibit originality, which may be in one of the following ways:
The types of works that may meet this criteria include:
Evidence of excellence would include:
Additional evidence of significance and impact may be provided by invitations to republish and by reviews.
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
A standard output constitutes a new and significant addition to the work of the creator. The endeavor is typically sustained over less than one year. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the digital work, which should exhibit at least one of the following attributes:
A major output involves new work of significant scale and complexity. The endeavor is typically sustained over one to five years. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the digital work, which should exhibit at least two of the following attributes:
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| J12 | Digital creative work ERA eligible, done at UniSC |
| J12Ext | Digital creative work ERA eligible, not done at UniSC |
| J12n | Digital creative work not ERA eligible |
Research outputs in this category include original or newly rendered work embodying research that is created specifically for dissemination through a website and is undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge and/or advance understanding in fields across the entire research spectrum. This may include the incorporation of new presentation techniques, methodologies or approaches in web media. The research is concerned with creating or rendering content, rather than with selecting content produced by others. In order to be eligible for this category the researcher is the creator of the creative works featured in the website. The significance of any new work rests on its entry into public discourse through publication.
The types of works that may not meet this criteria include:
Evidence of excellence would include:
Additional evidence of significance and impact may be provided by invitations to republish and by reviews.
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
A standard output constitutes a new and significant addition to the work of the creator. The endeavor is typically sustained over less than one year. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the web content, which should exhibit at least one of the following attributes:
A major output involves new work of significant scale and complexity. The endeavor is typically sustained over one to five years. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the web content, which should exhibit at least two of the following attributes:
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| J13 | Website/Web exhibition ERA eligible, done at UniSC |
| J13Ext | Website/Web exhibition ERA eligible, not done at UniSC |
| J13n | Website/Web exhibition not ERA eligible |
Research outputs in this category include live performances that are not otherwise able to be classifed as a Recorded/Rendered Creative Work in one of the other sub categories, and are not able to be classified in any of the other NTRO categories. These works embody research that is created specifically for dissemination through a website or other medium and is undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge and/or advance understanding in fields across the entire research spectrum. The research is concerned with creating or rendering content, rather than with selecting content produced by others. In order to be eligible for this category the researcher is the creator of the creative works featured in the website. The significance of any new work rests on its entry into public discourse through publication.
Evidence of excellence would include:
Additional evidence of significance and impact may be provided by invitations to republish and by reviews.
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
A standard output constitutes a new and significant addition to the work of the creator. The endeavor is typically sustained over less than one year. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the web content, which should exhibit at least one of the following attributes:
A major output involves new work of significant scale and complexity. The endeavor is typically sustained over one to five years. The creator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the web content, which should exhibit at least two of the following attributes:
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| J14 | Other recorded or rendered work ERA eligible, done at UniSC |
| J14Ext | Other recorded or rendered work ERA eligible, not done at UniSC |
| J14n | Other recorded or rendered work not ERA eligible |
Research outputs in this category include the curation and/or production of a substantial collection of material which embodies research and is undertaken on a systematic basis specifically for dissemination through a website in order to increase the stock of knowledge and/or advance understanding in fields across the research spectrum. This may include the inclusion of newly digitised materials that significantly extends their availability and enhances interpretation, or the incorporation of new or existing techniques, methodologies or approaches in web media. The research is concerned primarily with the selection and arrangement, or curation, rather than the production of content. The published site should include some form of introductory and/or curatorial statement.
The website should exhibit originality, which may be in one of the following ways:
The types of works that may meet this criteria include:
The types of works that may not meet this criteria include:
The significance of any new web-based exhibition or website rests on its entry into public discourse.
Excellence is demonstrated by:
Additional evidence of significance and impact may be provided by invitations to republish and by reviews.
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
A standard output constitutes a new and significant addition to the work of the curator. The endeavor is typically sustained over less than one year. The curator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the creation and curation of the website, which should exhibit at least one of the following attributes:
A major output involves new work of significant scale and complexity. The endeavor is typically sustained over one to five years. The curator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the creation and curation of the website, which should exhibit at least two of the following attributes:
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| J15 | Web-based exhibition ERA eligible, done at UniSC |
| J15Ext | Web-based exhibition ERA eligible, not done at UniSC |
| J15n | Web-based exhibition not ERA eligible |
Research outputs in this category include the curation and/or production of a substantial collection of creative works exhibited together in that particular arrangement for the first time in a recognised gallery, museum, or event, where the curation embodies research and is undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge and/or advance understanding in fields across the research spectrum, primarily in the creative arts, design, and the humanities. This may incorporate new curatorial techniques, methodologies or approaches. This should be accompanied by a well-researched publication that includes some form of curatorial statement, as well as the date and location of the exhibition. The significance of any new exhibition or event rests on its entry into public discourse.
The types of works that may not meet this criteria include:
Evidence of excellence would include:
Additional evidence of significance and impact may be provided by the invitation to repeat the exhibition/event and by reviews.
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
A standard output constitutes a new and significant addition to the work of the curator. The endeavor is typically sustained over less than one year. The curator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant curatorial role in the production of the exhibition or event, which should have at least one of the following attributes:
A major output involves new curatorial work of significant scale and complexity. The endeavor is typically sustained over one to five years. The curator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant curatorial role in the production of the exhibition or event, which should have at least two of the following attributes:a high degree of complexity and/or sophistication in curatorial technique, structure, or scale
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| J16 | Exhibition or event ERA eligible, done at UniSC |
| J16Ext | Exhibition or event ERA eligible, not done at UniSC |
| J16n | Exhibition or event not ERA eligible |
Research outputs in this category include the curation of creative works or performances arranged together for the first time in a substantial festival, where the curation embodies research and has been undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge in fields across the research spectrum, primarily in the creative arts, design, and the humanities. This should be accompanied by a program that includes a curatorial statement, as well as the date and location of each element of the festival. The significance of any new festival rests on its entry into public discourse.
Evidence of excellence would include:
Additional evidence of significance and impact may be provided by the invitation to repeat the exhibition/event and by reviews.
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
A standard output constitutes a new and significant addition to the work of the curator. The endeavor is typically sustained over less than one year. The curator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant curatorial role in the production of the festival, which should exhibit at least one of the following attributes:
A major output involves new curatorial work of significant scale and complexity. The endeavor is typically sustained over one to five years. The curator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant curatorial role in the production of the festival, which should exhibit at least two of the following attributes:
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| J17 | Festival ERA eligible, done at UniSC |
| J17Ext | Festival ERA eligible, not done at UniSC |
| J17n | Festival not ERA eligible |
Research outputs in this category include the curation and/or production of a substantial collection of archaeological, scientific, or other material objects exhibited together in that particular arrangement for the first time in a recognised gallery, museum, or event where the curation embodies research and is undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge and/or advance understanding in fields across the research spectrum. This should be accompanied by a well-researched publication that includes some form of curatorial statement, as well as the date and location of the exhibition.
The types of works that may not meet this criteria include:
The significance of any new exhibition rests on its entry into public discourse.
Evidence of excellence would include:
Additional evidence of significance and impact may be provided by the invitation to repeat the exhibition and by reviews.
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
A standard output constitutes a new and significant addition to the work of the curator. The endeavor is typically sustained over less than one year. The curator should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant curatorial role in the production of the exhibition, which should have at least one of the following attributes:
A major output involves new curatorial work of significant scale and complexity. The endeavor is typically sustained over one to five years. The curator should have a credited or acknowledged sole or lead curatorial role in the production of the exhibition, which should exhibit at least two of the following attributes:
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| J18 | Other curated event ERA eligible, done at UniSC |
| J18Ext | Other curated event ERA eligible, not done at UniSC |
| J18n | Other curated event not ERA eligible |
A report based on original research undertaken on a systematic basis to increase the stock of knowledge in the areas of government and non-government policy and practice, which has been commissioned or solicited by:
The types of works that may not meet this criteria include:
Note, if the report is to be made publicly available at a later date to the authored date that it was submitted to the commissioning body, the year of publication will be the date that it is made publicly available.
Evidence of excellence would include:
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
The endeavor is typically sustained over less than one year. The author should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the publicly available work, which should exhibit at least one of the following attributes:
The endeavor is typically sustained over one and five years. The author should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the production of the publically available work, which should exhibit at least two of the following attributes:
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| J19 | Reports ERA eligible, for the public sector (from ERA2018) |
| J19Ext | Reports ERA eligible, for the public sector, not done at UniSC (from ERA2018) |
| J20 | Reports ERA eligible, for industry (from ERA2018) |
| J20Ext | Reports ERA eligible, for industry, not done at UniSC (from ERA2018) |
| J21 | Reports ERA eligible, for not-for-profit organisations (from ERA2018) |
| J21Ext | Reports ERA eligible, for not-for-profit organisations, not done at UniSC (from ERA2018) |
| J22 | Reports ERA eligible, other reports (from ERA2018) |
| J22Ext | Reports ERA eligible, other reports, not done at UniSC (from ERA2018) |
| K1 | Reports ERA eligible done at UniSC (up to ERA2015) |
| K1Ext | Reports ERA eligible, not done at UniSC (up to ERA2015) |
| K1-NR | Reports not ERA eligible |
Research datasets are the recorded factual material commonly accepted in the research community as necessary to validate research findings. It relates to data generated, collected, or used, during research projects, and in some cases may include the research output itself. The output document should be in the form of a published metadata record in an accepted data repository with the data itself managed in an approved secure storage location with the dataset preferably open and sharable. A DOI (Digital Object Identifier) is required to be associated with the data record.
The types of works that may meet this criteria include:
The types of works that may not meet this criteria include:
Evidence of excellence would include:
Additional evidence of significance or impact may be provided by reuse by other researchers or research projects.
Evidence of peer review may be provided by academic/scholarly/professional peers in the form of:
A standard output constitutes a new and significant addition to the work of the researcher. The endeavor is typically sustained over less than one year. The researcher should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the creation of the work, which should exhibit one of the following attributes:
A major output involves a new work of significant scale and complexity. The endeavor is typically sustained over one and five years. The researcher should have a credited or acknowledged sole, lead, or significant role in the creation of the work, which should exhibit at least two of the following attributes:
Verification material that must be provided includes:
| Category Code | Definition |
|---|---|
| R1 | Research datasets at USC |
| R1Ext | Research datasets, not at USC |
