Program level criteria | HD | DN | CR | P | FL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Logic (reasoning based on principles of validity, and the development of a clear argument |
Discriminating A well-reasoned and detailed argument containing a premise-data- conclusion. Conclusions and related outcomes (consequences and implications) are supported by clear, logical and informed evaluation. Evidence and perspectives are Discussed. |
Connected/Advanced detailed argument containing a premise-data-conclusion. A range of information/data, including opposing viewpoints; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly. |
Relevant/connected Premises are supported with relevant and logically connected information/data presented. Conclusion is logically tied to all premises. |
Relevant Clear premises have been identified. Premises are tied to information/data presented. Some related outcomes or conclusions are made. |
Unclear and vague No clear connection between premises, data and conclusion. Statements are inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are oversimplified. |
Problem Solving |
Reflection on execution A logical, consistent plan is developed to solve problems. Consequences of solutions are recognised and the reason for choosing the solution articulated. |
Planning and executing A logical consistent plan is developed to the problem after selecting from among alternatives. |
Representing and formulating The possible causes or contributing factors of the problem are identified and described. Information gathering and choice of problem solving methodology identified. |
Exploring and understanding The problem is clearly defined/identified and contributing factors/elements listed. Problem exploration evident. |
Unclear and incoherent Problem is not clearly defined and contributing factors do not logically relate. Problem is not broken down and no methodology is evident in addressing the problem. Anecdotal and unrelated information used. |
Analysis |
Systematic and skilful Data/evidence is organised and relations are interpreted. Analysis of evidence reveals insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to topic. |
Thorough and effective Data/evidence reveals important patterns, differences, or similarities. Relations between data are highlighted and thorough. |
Effective descriptions/relations Data is described, organised and clear patterns, differences, or similarities are identified. |
Basic definitions/analysis Research/ data/content is described. Relations between parts of the data and what they may mean are identified. |
Lacks organisation Conducts a basic review. Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus. |
Evaluation |
Comprehensively and insightfully Comprehensive evaluation of solutions is deep, insightful and thorough (contains thorough and insightful explanation) and deeply considers: history of problem, reviews logic/ reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution. |
Thoroughly explains Evaluation critically examines, analyses and identifies key elements. A clear statement of judgement supported by facts. Determines broader, longer-term impact/change. |
Effectively explains Evaluation of solutions is adequate containing a relevant explanation and explains: history of problem, reviews logic/ reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution. |
Accurately explains Evaluation of solutions is brief; lacking some depth and includes descriptions of: history of problem, reviews logic/ reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution. |
Narrow explanation Evaluation of solutions is superficial (for example, contains cursory, surface level explanation) and includes the following: considers history of problem, reviews logic/ reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution. |
Synthesis (creativity) |
Perceptive and polished Transforms ideas or solutions into entirely new forms. Independently creates wholes out of multiple parts and draws conclusions by combining examples, facts, or theories from more than one field of study or perspective. |
Proficient The task demonstrates the combination of ideas or solutions into a coherent whole. Independently connects examples, facts, or theories from more than one field of study or perspective. |
Deeper understanding Ideas or solutions are connected in novel ways and help to produce a new and deeper understanding of the relationship between elements. The organisation demonstrates a deeper understanding of the issue and clearly indicates connections. |
Essential Deconstructs, recognises and identifies existing or obvious connections among ideas, problems or solutions. Demonstrates understanding of the issues and organised in a simple way. |
Superficial Limited connections between data – elements and ideas are left separate. |
Justification |
Sophisticated and coherent The claims, rationale and relevant facts are strong and sophisticated. This argument is detailed and evidences advanced critical thinking. |
Extensive and clear The justification has related relevant and detailed facts to the proposition or rationale. It is a well-researched and careful argument. |
Critical and clear The relationship between the facts and the rationale are clear – the claim is supported and sensible. |
Evident Reflection and examination of facts are evident a reason is given. |
Unjustified No justification made – no clear argument or point. |